Connections: what 39,000 ALS papers claim

An AI model read the abstract of every ALS paper in PubMed and recorded each claim: what was studied, what it did, in what kind of experiment, with the sentence it came from. Put side by side, the claims show what human trials found, what works in animals but has not been tried in people, and where studies disagree.

Read these as leads, with the evidence attached. Every claim links to its paper and shows the exact sentence it rests on, and that sentence was checked against the abstract. The label on each claim (reduces, no effect, and so on) was assigned by the model and has not been graded by experts. Only abstracts were read. Most results in cells and animals do not carry over to people.

What human trials found

Treatments with claims from human trials in three or more papers. For each outcome, the green bar counts papers reporting an improvement and the red bar papers reporting no effect. Several papers can describe the same trial, so this counts reports, not trials.

TreatmentPapersBy outcome: improved / no effect